The most prestigious graduate fellowships rarely publish a GPA cut-off, which leaves applicants guessing whether they are even in the running. This checker compares your GPA against the typical range of successful applicants for six flagship awards and flags where you are competitive, borderline, or below the usual bar.
How it works
For each fellowship the checker stores a competitive GPA benchmark drawn from the profile of typical awardees. Your GPA is compared to that benchmark with a small borderline window:
gpa >= benchmark -> competitive
gpa >= benchmark − 0.15 -> borderline
otherwise -> below typical bar
Each result carries a note on what the award weighs most, because for these programmes the GPA is only the entry ticket.
What the benchmarks reflect
These are not official minimums. NSF GRFP states no GPA minimum at all; Rhodes, Marshall, Gates Cambridge, and Churchill judge research, leadership, and fit. The numbers here approximate where successful applicants typically sit so you can gauge realism.
Notes
Treat a “competitive” flag as permission to apply, not a prediction of success. Research output, a sharp project, and references that can speak to your potential matter far more than the last decimal of your GPA.