Make the thinking behind your model explicit
A financial model is only as credible as its assumptions. Investors and finance reviewers spend most of their time interrogating the inputs — growth rate, churn, CAC, headcount — not re-checking your formulas. This builder turns your key inputs into a clean assumptions document and computes the derived SaaS ratios (LTV, LTV/CAC, CAC payback) so you can pressure-test the model before anyone else does.
How it works
You enter the core drivers and the tool computes the standard unit-economics outputs:
LTV = (ARPA × gross margin) ÷ monthly churn rate
LTV/CAC = LTV ÷ CAC
CAC payback (months) = CAC ÷ (ARPA × gross margin)
Dividing by the monthly churn rate approximates the average customer lifetime in months, and multiplying ARPA by gross margin keeps LTV on a contribution basis so it is directly comparable to CAC. The document also captures the assumptions that do not reduce to a single number — the headcount plan, infrastructure cost trajectory, and revenue recognition policy — because those drive the cost side of the model.
Tips and example
- Use conservative churn. A small change in churn swings LTV dramatically because it sits in the denominator.
- Keep ARPA and CAC in the same currency and period; mixing monthly and annual figures is the most common modelling error.
- State your revenue recognition basis explicitly (e.g. recognise annual contracts ratably over 12 months) — it changes when revenue appears in the model.
- Treat the computed ratios as directional sanity checks, not precise forecasts; pair them with cohort data once you have it.