Japanese Grade System Converter (A/B/C/D Scale)

Convert Japanese university grades to US GPA and ECTS.

Enter your Japanese university grades (Shu/Yu/Ryo/Ka/Fuka or A/B/C/D) to compute a US 4.0 GPA and ECTS grade equivalent, with notes on grade inflation by institution type.

How does the Japanese grading scale map to a US GPA?

Most Japanese universities use a 5-tier scale: S/Shu (90-100) = 4.0, A/Yu (80-89) = 3.0, B/Ryo (70-79) = 2.0, C/Ka (60-69) = 1.0, and F/Fuka (below 60) = 0.0. Some newer programs award an extra 4.0 band for S grades, which this tool reflects.

Japanese university grade conversion

Japanese universities report results on a five-tier scale that uses either traditional kanji-derived names (Shu, Yu, Ryo, Ka, Fuka) or modern letter labels (S, A, B, C, F). When you apply to a US graduate program or transfer credits within Europe, you need that scale expressed as a 4.0 GPA or an ECTS letter. This converter performs a credit-weighted conversion so each course counts in proportion to its credits.

How it works

Each grade maps to a US grade point and a percentage band:

S / Shu   90-100%  ->  4.0  (ECTS A)
A / Yu    80-89%   ->  3.0  (ECTS B)
B / Ryo   70-79%   ->  2.0  (ECTS C)
C / Ka    60-69%   ->  1.0  (ECTS D)
F / Fuka  0-59%    ->  0.0  (ECTS F)

The weighted GPA is the sum of each course’s grade point times its credits, divided by the total credits:

GPA = sum(gradePoint_i * credits_i) / sum(credits_i)

Courses with zero or blank credits are ignored. If you leave the grade unset the row is skipped.

Tips and notes

  • Many Japanese schools use a four-tier scale (A, B, C, F) without an S band. If yours does, simply never select S and the top grade A maps to the 80-89 band as printed on your transcript; check whether your school treats A as 4.0 or 3.0.
  • Grade inflation differs by institution. National universities typically grade harder than some private universities, so the same letter can reflect different mastery.
  • Admissions committees frequently apply their own conversion table, so use this figure as a planning estimate, not an official equivalence.